Runswithscissors111
Animation of the Wave-Particle Duality through the double slit experiment with and without an observer.
Thought I should share this video on YouTube as I am very interested in Quantum Physics. If you like this video, I highly encourage you all to visit the source link below for lots of other cool animations and more info!
Source: http://www.toutestquantique.fr/
Source
a single slit with wave , is the result a wave?
I think there is an error in the simulation that when the quantum object is observed.. Its previous wave function collapsed and that collapsed to form a more localised wave function can never attain the previous wave function unoess any interaction with photon occures again as per the copenhagen interpretation
I must be another level of stupid bc I don’t understand this
WTF
What do you mean by quantum object ?
This mystery of universe is a topic to fabricste stories no one knows and will ever know secrets of univers. explain infinite space no boundaries. Which csme First energy or mass?
How to reproduce this and the observer in a homemade experiment?
thanks
Hi
Could this experiment be explained if we had an emergent interactive process unfolding photon by photon? This idea is based on: (E=ˠM˳C²)∞ with energy ∆E equals mass ∆M linked to the Lorentz contraction ˠ of space and time. The Lorentz contraction ˠ represents the time dilation of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. We have energy ∆E slowing the rate that time ∆t flows as a universal process of energy exchange or continuous creation. Mass will increase relative to this process with gravity being a secondary force to the electromagnetic force. The c² represents the speed of light c radiating out in a sphere 4π of EMR from its radius forming a square c² of probability. We have to square the probability of the wave-function Ψ because the area of the sphere is equal to the square of the radius of the sphere multiplied by 4π. This simple geometrical process forms the probability and uncertainty of everyday life and at the smallest scale of the process is represented mathematically by Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π. In such a theory we have an emergent future unfolding photon by photon with the movement of charge and flow of EM fields. This gives us a geometrical reason for positive and negative charge with a concaved inner surface for negative charge and a convexed outer surface for positive charge. The brackets in the equation (E=ˠM˳C²)∞ represent a dynamic boundary condition of an individual reference frame with an Arrow of Time or time line for each frame of reference. The infinity ∞ symbol represents an infinite number of dynamic interactive reference frames that are continuously coming in and out of existence.
When you dont look at it, you see a band of five but when you look at it, you see a bank of TWO! When we look at it, maybe we are bringing it into our dimension.
this is FANTASTIC 😛
Wrong well done! A weird expression, just like QM.
Bullshit explanation accompanied by irritating 'music'.
I love this animation. It really helped me to understand the phenomenon of wave and particle at the same time.
this is wrong, once it become a particle, it will not become a wave anymore.
I really don't get it why when an Observer/measuring device is included, the quantum particle suddenly acted differently? Can anyone give a scientific explanation? or is it a unsolved problem?
retarded comments everywhere…
Is it possible that a photon is a particle that acts like a wave because it has a dark matter particle orbiting it, pulling it into an axial wave motion as it travels?
That could explain the double slit experiment results, including with a detector with some interaction between the dark matter and the detector.
Perhaps the only reason for photons' max speed limit is the dark matter they're paired with.
This could also explain why the universe is expanding from the central Singularity point of the Big Bang outward in all directions faster than the speed of light into previously completely empty universe space, given that there is no Dark Matter there yet.
This could also explain the deflection of the axis of the particle's wave motion moving thru polarizing filters rotated less than 45 degrees apart. What do you think?
What if the `wave` component of light is just a side effect of travelling `particles` ? Just like shooting a cannon, the surrounding objects around the cannon are affected by air pressure even though she shell itself has nothing to do with it. An observer who is not aware of the air molecules may think that it's the shell shattering into tiny particles hitting the surround objects and make them vibrate. Maybe photons create waves as they travel in an unknown matter that can't be observed by today's science. Maybe it's not the photons creating the `wave` effect.
Some people have said that the very presence of the measuring devices interferes with the particles so it in a way entangled. But the other part of the experiment shows that they have left the measuring device there but is turned off, and when this happens the particle knows it is not turned on and the interference is still there.
This animation is better and more accurate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=88&v=O55XiriEaQI
Nullissime !
Absolutely nothing 'SIMPLE' about light's wave-particle duality, except the partially inaccurate clip.
But you've got it totally wrong from 1:11 onward when you stick that eye thingie in there.
With an observer and two slits, you don't get an even spread all over the back screen. You will get two piles. Duh.
"Oops" is the first word you're looking for. Then "thank you" maybe.
You're welcome.
Fucked it up at "observer".
que raios
why pariticle penetrate the wall ?
it must go through the slit
Look for the new difinition of the colorfulness of photon on SALEH THEORY group's youtube chanel: Saleh Theory-com
what is the slit here? are you not influencing your experiments result by even trying to measure?
our incapability to measure the electrons position or momentum by using our current devices is what the limiting factor here?
Observer or measuring device. I have my problems with them. Is the measuring device, whatever it might be, acting upon the particles in order to be able to observe or measure them? What if the measuring device could be altered in sensitivity whilst measuring? Will that have an effect too? Imagine using a potentiometer to turn down measurement to zero where at zero no measurement is taking place anymore, will the particles act as if no measuring device were there? And at what stage of "opening up" the measuring device with the potentiometer are the particles affected in their behaviour?
WOKE
so fucking cool!
don't get it ! if we throw particles though two slits, shouldn't they form two damn fringes!!
no entiendo ! si tiramos particulas por dos rendijas deberían formar dos malditas franjas !!!!
what does the observer do?
pretty awesome!
Those big dummies. Today's physicists do agree that an apple has both an inside and an outside, but they don't think the same when it comes to the structure of reality. Yes they say that we exist within a 4 dimensional environment known as Space-Time, and we move across that dimension known as Time.
However, we are always confined to the "present" time. That is the inside of our reality.
The outside is the rest of the dimension of time that exists other than this inside "present time". This side is ignored by today's physicists. They instead leave it to the religious folk under the title, the "spirit world".
Now, since photons or electrons are spinning particles, their path across space is a corkscrew like shape. From the outside of our reality, where we look across time, one can see the entire corkscrew shaped path that extends from the source of the light/electrons, all the way across to the destination wall or screen.
Thus from the outside point of view, which looks across time, the entire corkscrew path of an individual photon or electron is seen, thus the entire path is filled or blocked based upon the laws of physics on the outside.
However, one path of a photon or electron may cross the path of another, and do so since one corkscrew like shape may wrap around another. Due to the corkscrew shapes, the area available of which one path may be wrapping around another path, decreases and increases all depending upon the point of crossing. This produces an interference pattern.
If the 2 slit experiment is run for say 5 minutes, from the outside this is seen as being a single 5 minute 4 dimensional event. However, if detectors are enabled at the 2 slits, each detection is an event in itself. Thus if again the experiment is run for 5 minutes, here the experiment is broken down into a multitude of "detection" events. Thus thanks to this breakdown, it can no longer be governed from the outside as a single event, thus now not being governed from the outside, the entire corkscrew shaped paths of each photon or electron are no longer taken into account, thus we are now dealing with only particle behavior. Thus the interference pattern vanishes.