Seeker
Interference patterns with particles have stumped scientists for years, but when they put antimatter through the test, they revealed an even bigger mystery.
This Is The Only Place Antimatter Can Survive In The Universe – https://youtu.be/XD8Q3Mb1Q4I
Read More:
First Observation Of Antimatter Wave Interference
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.08901.pdf
“The periodic spatial distribution generated by the interferometer (Fig. 1) is revealed by a nuclear
emulsion detector. Nuclear emulsions14 offer submicron level position resolution in the detection of
ionizing particles9,15. They work as photographic films by exploiting the properties of silver-bromide
crystals embedded in a 50 μm thick gelatin matrix. For this experiment we developed a glass-supported emulsion detector and experimentally demonstrated its capability to resolve periodic patterns at the micrometric scale even with low signal contrast and on large areas”
This Classic Physics Experiment Could Finally Reveal The Long-Awaited ‘Theory of Everything’
https://www.sciencealert.com/this-classic-physics-experiment-could-finally-reveal-the-long-awaited-theory-of-everything
“That’s not so strange though – we know that matter (ping-pong balls) doesn’t behave in the same way as waves. But when physicists fired particles like electrons and photons at the double slit, expecting them to act like matter, they instead acted like waves, producing an interference pattern. And it gets even crazier than that. These electrons and photons aren’t acting like matter, but they aren’t acting like waves either, because they’re not messing with each other to produce an interference pattern.”
Antimatter mysteries 2: How do you make antimatter?
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16832-antimatter-mysteries-2-how-do-you-make-antimatter/
“Two CERN experiments, ATRAP and ALPHA, are grappling with that question. Their aim is to make antihydrogen – the simplest anti-atom possible, just an antiproton and a positron bound together – in sufficient quantity and for long enough to compare the spectrum of light it emits with that of regular hydrogen. Even the slightest difference between the two would shake up the standard model.”
____________________
Elements is more than just a science show. It’s your science-loving best friend, tasked with keeping you updated and interested on all the compelling, innovative and groundbreaking science happening all around us. Join our passionate hosts as they help break down and present fascinating science, from quarks to quantum theory and beyond.
Seeker explains every aspect of our world through a lens of science, inspiring a new generation of curious minds who want to know how today’s discoveries in science, math, engineering and technology are impacting our lives, and shaping our future. Our stories parse meaning from the noise in a world of rapidly changing information.
Visit the Seeker website https://www.seeker.com/videos
Elements on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/SeekerElements/
Subscribe now! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=dnewschannel
Seeker on Twitter http://twitter.com/seeker
Seeker on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/SeekerMedia/
Seeker http://www.seeker.com/
Source
Science is about how, not why!
00:11 …what the hell're ya pointing at?!?
turn the detector(s) ON/OFF at a source variable frequency
Gravity does not exist folks, gravity is an electromagnetic phenomenon and The Electric Universe the Thunderbolts Project will teach you this. It is your future to know this. Or be left behind ?
Double split uses atoms, atoms are effected by electrons, electrons are found in energy, energy powered the device that captured the data, is it then not possible for the device recording the interactions to have a direct affect on the experiment?
You cannot carry out an observation without somehow interfering with what you observe
– Alan watts
Unison … she s cute so i helped her…
Photons going through one slit produce a single slit diffraction pattern, not a line.
3:08 – "This new study replicated the double slit experiment using positrons – demonstrating that anti-matter behaves the same way matter does in this situation". There ya go – the entire content that has ANYTHING whatsoever to do with the title of the video.
"But I don't wear glasses". "Shut up, you'll look more sciency if you wear them. Just wear them". "Okay"
Its stuff like this that makes science and math so addictive!
Oh dear god. Are you guys talking about particle physics or fucking cheese balls. That is just embarrassing and thomas young would roll in his grave.
Double Slit Experiment Solved?
ebook: http://www.blurb.com/ebooks/p386f23516856a53b7226
Hard: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/invited/7956954/03fba3bcc146d79f87fb39a95c04a444034e01a6
So why didn't you tell us "What Happens When You Put Antimatter in a Double Slit Experiment?"
I hate this channel. It’s all talk. No experiment and merging other videos in their video. This channel is for the views only. MONEY!!! Less talk, show your experiment. Your videos are all scripted. I bet you don’t even understand some of what your saying….
fucking clickbait!
So what happens when you put Antimatter in Double Slit experiment??? You didn't answer the question till the end. So what's the point of the video
How do they have enough anti-matter to do this experiment?
antimatter flies to the place in the universe where there are less gravitational waves.
Did you just say cheese balls
People are going to misinterpreted this and think the observer effect is related to consciousness.
They are stuck because they go with the crazy explanations. I would go with simple obvious explanations and investigate those. My favorite is multiverse and we are linked at the minutest level. We have particles or whatever that move between constantly holding them together. The other is that time is more than one dimension and we only see what is synchronous to our time. Differences may be smooth or jumps between levels.
Eres bellisima, me encantas